Where does this wacko get this stuff from. He has got to be a demon from hell.
Representative Adam Schiff (D-CA) said Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation” that the Republican Party was “an autocratic cult around Donald Trump,” and it was “not interested in governing.”
Partial transcript as follows:
BRENNAN: That’s the challenge is when you’re doing it only on party lines, it once again looks to people at home like, they can’t get along, Washington’s not working again.
SCHIFF: Well, look, we have a Republican Party that is now an autocratic cult around Donald Trump. It is not interested in governing. It’s not interested in even maintaining the solvency in the credit worthiness of the country. And we have to recognize that they’re not interested in governing. And so we’re going to govern, we’re going to have to do it. And if we have to do it with our own votes, we will do that. But we need to show that democracy delivers, that it can help people put food on the table, that it can address these huge disparities in income. There’s so much reason why our democracy is at this fragile point right now, and we need to foremost deliver on the economy, but also on voting rights and stop these efforts to disenfranchise people.
BRENNAN: You just made an incredible statement about an autocratic cult. This is one of the themes in your book. You aren’t often compared to conservative writers like Robert Kagan, but you come to basically the same conclusion he just did in a very widely read essay where he says essentially that it’s the Republican Party that is trying to lay the groundwork to challenge the next few elections. You say preparing the battlefield for the struggle to overturn the election, should they regain majorities in Congress, they might be successful. You’re saying we’re on the cusp of a constitutional crisis?
SCHIFF: Yes. And this is really why I wrote the book because I want it to sound the alarm that our democracy is hanging by a thread right now as a member of the January 6 committee. You know, I have to acknowledge there may be another violent attack on the Capitol, but what is even more pressing a threat is what we see Republicans doing around the country taking this big lie about the last election and running with it. And I wanted to tell the story in this book about how- how does that happen, how in four short years does our democracy become so threatened? And one of the terrible realizations for me is that so many of the people I worked with across the aisle, who I admired and respected because I believe that they believed what they were saying, turned out not to believe it at all. That the only thing that they cared about was the maintenance of their power or position. And I want to show people how that happens, how people start by making small compromises of their morality and their values and their ideology and end up completely capitulating because one of the things we discovered in the impeachment trial, but really both trials is that there’s nothing wrong about our constitution. The provisions are brilliant. But unless they’re animated by people who- who give content to their oath that- that understand the importance of right and wrong, none of it works. And right now, we saw Grassley in Iowa yesterday, unable to condemn the president’s effort to- to get the Justice Department to overturn the election. Scalise this morning, another Republican leader unable to acknowledge that the election wasn’t stolen. It’s these personal capitulations that are putting our country at risk.
BRENNAN: And that’s a shift from where Sen. Grassley, who accepted the president- former president’s endorsement, was right after the events of January 6. But I want to come back to where you lay blame because you say it’s “we, the country who made Donald Trump possible. We- he would not have been able to batter and break so many of our democratic norms had we not let him. Had we not been capable of endless rationalization, had we not forgotten why we came to office in the first place.” What responsibility do you think Democrats have for damaging the faith of the country as well?
SCHIFF: Look, I think Democrats have been defending our democracy for the last five years. We have put up a valiant fight for the heart and soul of this country, so I really can’t lay the blame at the Democratic Party.
BRENNAN: You don’t take any responsibility.
SCHIFF: Well, look, I- as I acknowledge in my book, there are lots of things I could have done differently or better. But at the end of the day, one of our two great parties has completely abandoned its ideology. It has made itself an anti-truth, anti-democratic cult of the former president, and the responsibility is on that party to once again become a party of ideas. And there are some hopeful signs. And one of the things I want to emphasize in the book too is there are also some great profiles in courage that emerge from this period. One of them you’re going to have on your show later today, Fiona Hill. But Marie Yovanovitch and Alexander Vindman, people like Dan Coats, you know, Republicans like Dan Coats, who- who did their duty, defended the intelligence community wouldn’t carry out the president’s big lies. And we need to be inspired by those examples because we all have a role to play right now in the preservation of this democracy.
This article contains commentary which reflects the author’s opinion Reminder : The purpose of the articles that you will find on this website is to EDUCATE our opinions and not to disinform or grow hate and anger.
It’s so easy to look at what’s happening in America and say “we’re divided because the left is trying to destroy the country and the right is trying to save it.”
People on the left, say the same thing, only vice versa.
They’re as convinced as you are that the right is trying to destroy the country and the left is trying to save it. I know that sounds absolutely bizarre, but it’s true.
So, there’s much more going on here than just “right vs left.”
And that’s what Tucker is very artfully pointing out.
See, this isn’t an “us vs them” in the simple sense – this is them, the elites from the right and the left, replacing our free system with an authoritarian one that no longer has to “convince” you of anything – it simply TELLS you what to do and you obey.
Have you noticed that lately? Joe Biden doesn’t feel the need to explain anything or answer any questions – you’re the lowly peasants, so he just turns and walks away.
And, if you think for one second that someone like Mitch McConnell isn’t “all-in” on this plan, you’re higher than Hunter Biden on a crack bender.
He is…and no amount of judges he confirms, or pre-determined Dem bills that he supposedly “stops” will change that.
Politics is like wrestling. It’s all scripted.
In some matches, the good guys win (whoever is in power at the moment) and in some matches, the bad guys win.
And all the while the crowd is in their seats cheering or booing for a show that is scripted and the outcome is already known to the actors playing their roles.
Seriously, that’s what this is like…Mitch doesn’t dislike Chuck Schumer. He loves the guy…they likely agree on 90% of the stuff they pretend to argue about.
Here’s a bit of what Tucker said: You can watch the video below
Tucker is 100 percent right.And I will say this again – we need to all get over the “elections don’t work” mentality – yes, I know that 2020 sucked, trust me, I get it, but we need to keep pushing for reforms, and put our heads down and get 100% back into the game…because if we don’t get rid of these establishment RINOs, McConnell, Graham, Grassley, and the rest of them, no matter how “low” they fly under the radar, we will never win at anything.Because those guys are all corrupted and they’re not looking out for you and me, they’re looking out for themselves, and if that means sitting back and allowing the Dems to do the dirty work for them, they’ll do it.
Happily, and then they’ll pretend to be outraged and fundraise off of it. Politics is the biggest show on earth. I promise you all, those establishment old-timers (and some of the new-timers) hate the MAGA and America First voters more than Democrats do, and they’re perfectly happy watching our freedoms get snuffed out.
He was called the “Great Communicator.” His ability to hold the attention of his audience with his easy-going dialogue, almost fatherly demeanor, was almost uncanny endearing him to the populace. While not having trained in college in debate or as an orator, Ronald Reagan discovered his gift in Hollywood, reading and memorizing script on the set, making movies. He honed his gift of communication after he became president of the screen actors guild and later as governor of California, which became a springboard to his eventual presidential campaign. He could inspire a nation through uplifting messages as well as enflame his opponents. Ronald Reagan could unite a people with his charisma and communication, and he could divide. He has been designated as the “Great Communicator.”
What Ronald Reagan was in politics to the American people, Jesus of Nazareth was to the people of Israel. He was the Great Communicator of spiritual truth and reality. Jesus inspired the masses with thought provoking messages that brought comfort and confidence in a period where little existed and inspired them to look beyond meaningless tradition, the empty and vague and suffocating legalism of its leaders.
Mark portrays Jesus as the Tireless Servant of God. It is a book of action and immediacy. In the weeks prior to this occasion, the Master was with the disciples on the Sea of Galilee when He calmed the storm. He traveled to Gadara where the demoniac was set free of a legion of demons, cured the woman with the issue of blood of twelve years, and restored to life the dead daughter of Jairus, the ruler of the synagogue in Capernaum. All the while, everywhere He went, Jesus was busy teaching.
Following this busy cycle of events, Mark said that Jesus “went out from thence, and came into his own country” (1). Where was “his own country”? The word country translates from the Greek ‘patris,’ which literally means “father-land.” In other words, His native town. The Lord Jesus returned to visit Nazareth once again. And as was His custom, “when the sabbath day was come, he began to teach in the synagogue” (2). It is interesting that the Gospel writers inform us that Jesus only visited “his own country” twice after beginning His public ministry. Again, He was in the synagogue and taught the people.
The visit ended with their rejection of Him, offended by the word that He taught, and Matthew said, “he did not many mighty works there because of their unbelief” (Mt. 13:54-58). This was the second and last visit of Jesus to Nazareth and Mark said again, “and many hearing him were astonished…” (Mk. 6:2). Many, many times throughout the four gospels, the people were astonished. What does that mean in a broader way? Four truths can be discovered from that statement.
This wasn’t the first time the Lord had taught in the synagogue in Nazareth. But the reaction of the people in Nazareth was like the reaction of the people in Capernaum or wherever Jesus taught. They were astonished, marvelled, amazed, left in wonder at the authority and depth of His teaching and the insight which He had. Mark said, “many hearing him were astonished, saying, From whence hath this man these things? and what wisdom is this which is given unto him, that even such mighty works are wrought by his hands?” (Mk. 6:2). In short, most were confused by this new Master in Israel. He hadn’t attended rabbinical school, yet His teaching transcended theirs. Unlike the scribes, the Pharisees, and Sadducees, His teaching was authoritative, forceful, and quickened the mind. Israel’s elite teachers couldn’t refute His teaching. His questions bit them. The Nazarene, as they called Him, confused them. When God’s word is preached today by a man of God with the same Spirit of God it still confuses the mind of the unbeliever.
Jesus’ teaching offended them or convicted them of personal sin. Matthew interestingly said of the response to His teaching, “And they were offended in him” (Mt. 13:57). Offended come from the Greek ‘skandalizo,’ which means “entrap, to trip-up, to stumble.” We receive our English word ‘scandal or scandalize’ from this verb. As John MacArthur wrote on Matthew’s text, “We have no full account of what Jesus taught on either occasion in that Nazareth synagogue; but both times He offended the people by what He said. He unmasked their hypocrisy by exposing their wicked desire to see Him perform miracles for miracles’ sake (Lk. 4:23); and He probably talked to them about their sinfulness and need to repent. In any case, they became antagonistic and took offense at Him, because their unbelief blinded them to the truth He taught.”
Scripture is replete with illustrations of prophets and men of God confronting the nation, the people, and even kings over personal sin and their response to God’s word. Of them all, the occasion of King David’s great sin with Bathsheba illustrates this in a positive way. After the prophet Nathan confronted the king with his sin, it is written that “David said unto Nathan, I have sinned against the Lord. And Nathan said unto David, The Lord also hath put away thy sin; thou shalt not die” (2 Sa. 12:13). In contrast to David, was Herod Antipas, husband of the infamous Heroidas, who had John the Baptist beheaded at her request because John condemned them for their illicit marriage.
The teaching of truth, God’s pure, unadulterated word, will produce one of two responses: it will be received or rejected. Truth rejected is the result of a closed mind/heart. The Lord Jesus said to the disciples following the giving of the parables, “For this people’s heart is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes they have closed; lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and should understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them” (Mt. 13:15). Truth doubted and denied is truth rejected. And truth rejected endangers the eternal soul to eternal condemnation. The Apostle Paul, a former Pharisee, wrote, “But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them” (2 Co. 4:3-4).
Many that heard Jesus’ teaching believed and, as a result, experienced a changed life. They were amazed at first, perplexed, somewhat confused in the beginning. But with the corresponding power to heal the sick, cast out demons, and raise the dead that could have only come from God the Father, many of the skeptics were converted and changed by this same power. Just as was the demoniac of Gadara of whom it was said after the legion was cast from him. When the people of the area came out to see firsthand what had happened, they saw, “him that was possessed with the devil, and had the legion, sitting, and clothed, and in his right mind.” He became a follower of the Lord. 2 Corinthians 5:17 is the testimony of every believer that experiences the life-changing power of Jesus Christ— “Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.” My prayer is that this is your testimony as it is mine.
Marine Lt. Col. Stuart Scheller, the outspoken Marine who went viral for questioning the nation’s top military leaders amid a chaotic exit from Afghanistan, is being released from the brig today.
Scheller was initially jailed at Camp Lejeune last Monday after he refused to follow an order by military authorities to stop posting to social media, an order that was made after he posted a series of viral videos that featured him criticizing military leaders for their handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal.
“All our son did is ask the questions that everybody was asking themselves, but they were too scared to speak out loud,” Scheller’s father, Stu Scheller Sr., told Task & Purpose last week. “He was asking for accountability. In fact, I think he even asked for an apology that we made mistakes, but they couldn’t do that, which is mind-blowing.”
The outspoken officer was three years from being able to retire when he was relieved of his command and put into confinement while awaiting trial for contempt.
“My son is an exemplary Marine and he has been for 17 years,” Scheller’s mother, Cathy Scheller, told Fox News last week. “He knew that everyone else felt the same way. He thought if he took the lead, others would stand up and call for accountability. They did not. So he is taking the full brunt himself.”
Scheller last weekend drew backlash with his comments aimed towards former President Donald Trump and his son Don Trump Jr. via Facebook, saying he’d “rather sit in jail” than work with the former president.
“President Trump. I was told by everyone to kiss the ring because of your following and power. I refuse,” Scheller posted via Facebook, last Saturday.
“While I respect your foreign policy positions, I hate how you divided the country,” he wrote. “I don’t need or want your help. You do not have the ability to pull US together. You may even win the next election. But your generation’s time is running out.”
“Tell your son to stop tweeting about me,” the Marine added, referring to Don Trump Jr. “Your whole family knows nothing about US or our sacrifices.”
“I could never work with you. I’d rather sit in jail and be released with a dishonorable than make compromises in my beliefs,” added Scheller
Herland Report: Dangers of Covid-19 mRNA vaccination: If you want to save your life from murderous “public health officials” and murderous lying presstitutes, read journalist Mike Whitney’s report.
The world is indebted to Whitney for producing the evidence that inoculation with mRNA injection brings high risk of health injury and death.
The governments that encourage and coerce Covid inoculation are mass murderers who should be tried and executed for their crimes against humanity, writes Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, a leading American political economist, author and regular contributor to The Herland Report.
Dangers of Covid-19 mRNA vaccination: “I’ll do one more mind experiment with you: If everyone on the planet were to get Covid and not get treated, the death-rate globally would be less than half a percent. I’m not advocating for that, because 35 million people would die. However, if we follow the advice of some of the global leaders– like Bill Gates who said last year said “7 billion people need to be vaccinated”– then the death-rate will be over 2 billion people! SO, WAKE UP! THIS IS WORLD WAR 3!
Did the drug companies conduct any animal trials prior to the FDA’s approval that would have convinced a reasonable person that the vaccines were safe to use on humans?
No, they didn’t.
Did they complete long-term clinical trials to establish whether the vaccines were safe?
No, there were no long-term clinical trials.
Did they conduct any bio-distribution studies that showed where the substance in the injection goes in the body?
They did, but the data was not made available to the public.
Do the contents of the vaccine largely collect in various organs and in the lining of the vascular system?
Yes, they do.
Do large amounts of the substance accumulate in the ovaries?
Dangers of Covid-19 mRNA vaccination: Will this effect female fertility and a woman’s ability to safely bring a baby to term?
The drug companies are currently researching this. The results are unknown.
Does the vaccine enter the bloodstream and collect in the lining of the blood vessels forcing the cells to produce the spike protein?
Is the spike protein a “biologically active” pathogen?
Does the spike protein cause blood clots and leaky blood vessels in a large percentage of the people that are vaccinated?
It does, although the blood clots are mostly microscopic and appear in the capillaries. Only a small percentage of vaccinees get strokes or suffer cardiac arrest.
Should people be made aware of these possible bad outcomes before they agree to get vaccinated? (“Informed consent”)
Did the FDA know that Pfizer had “identified vaccine-associated enhanced disease, including vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease, as an important potential risk”?
Yes, they did, but they did not demand that Pfizer fix the problem. Here’s more:
“The FDA noted that Pfizer, “identified vaccine-associated enhanced disease, including vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease, as an important potential risk”.
The EMA similarly acknowledged that “vaccine associated enhanced respiratory disease” was “an important potential risk… that may be specific to vaccination for COVID- 19”.
Why neither regulator sought to exclude such dangers prior to emergency use authorization is an openquestion that all doctors and patients are entitled to ask.
Dangers of Covid-19 mRNA vaccination: Why medical regulators failed to investigate the finding that large vaccine particles cross blood vessel walls, entering the bloodstream and posing risks of blood clotting and leaky vessels is yet another open question again.” (“Open Letter to the EMA and European Parliament”, Doctors for Covid Ethics)
Did the drug companies vaccinate the people in the placebo group after the clinical trials in order to conceal the difference in the long-term health outcomes between the two groups?
That is the conclusion a rational person would make.
So, they nuked the trials?
Did the FDA largely shrug-off its regulatory duties and abandon its normal standards and protocols because
a– It wanted to rush the Covid vaccines into service as rapidly as possible? b– It knew the Covid-19 vaccine would never meet long-term safety standards?
We don’t know yet, but the adverse events report strongly suggests that the Covid-19 vaccine is hands-down the most dangerous vaccine in history.
Is the FDA rushing the “boosters” without proper testing?
Yes, it is. Here’s a clip from author Alex Berenson’s latest at Substack:
“Pfizer basically hasn’t bothered to test the booster AT ALL in the people actually at risk – it conducted a single “Phase 1” trial that covered 12 people over 65. The main Phase 2/3 booster trial (beware efforts to cover multiple “phases” of drug research at once, you want it bad you get it bad) included no one over 55.
Have the boosters been modified or improved to meet the changes in Delta variant?
Is there any additional risk in taking a booster-shot after already taking two experimental gene-based vaccines in less than a year?
Considerable risk. Here’s more from the Doctors for Covid Ethics:
“Given that booster shots repeatedly boost the immune response to the spike protein,they will progressively boost self-to-self immune attack, including boosting complement-mediated damage to vessel walls.
Clinically speaking, the greater the vessel leakage and clotting that subsequently occurs, the more likely that organs supplied by the affected blood flow will sustain damage.
From stroke to heart attack to brain vein thrombosis, the symptoms can range from death to headaches, nausea and vomiting, all of which heavily populate adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.
As well as damage from leakage and clotting alone, it is additionally possible that the vaccine itself may leak into surrounding organs and tissues. Should this take place, the cells of those organs will themselves begin to produce spike protein, and will come under attack in the same way as the vessel walls.
Damage to major organs such as the lungs, ovaries, placenta and heart can be expected ensue, with increasing severity and frequency as booster shots are rolled out.” (“Open Letter to the EMA and European Parliament“, Doctors for Covid Ethics)
So, it’s the double-whammy. On the one hand, the booster will perform largely like the original vaccine, penetrating cells and forcing them to produce spike protein which, in turn, generates blood clots and leaky blood vessels.
And, on the other, the newly-produced S proteins trigger a damaging immune response in which the complement system attacks and destroys the cells that line the inside of the blood vessels.
Every additional booster will intensify this process weakening the vascular system and increasing the clotting. If the Doctors are correct in their analysis, then we could see a sharp uptick in all-cause mortality in the heavily-vaccinated countries in less than a year. Cardiac arrests are already rising.
Here’s another question that’s worth mulling over: Was there any reason for the regulators at the FDA to think that these problems would not arise following the launching of the vaccine campaign?
No. They should have known there would be problems as soon as they saw that the vaccine did not stay in the shoulder as it was supposed to.
Dangers of Covid-19 mRNA vaccination: The vaccine wasn’t supposed to enter the bloodstream and spread across the body leaving billions of spike proteins in its wake. (The spike protein is a cytotoxin, a cell killer. It is not an appropriate antigen for stimulating an immune response. It is a potentially-lethal pathogen that poses a threat to one’s health even if it is separated from the virus.)
Nor was the vaccine supposed to trigger Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) which is the condition we hinted at above when referring to “vaccine-associated enhanced disease”. Here’s a brief explanation:
“ADE has proven to be a serious challenge with coronavirus vaccines, and this is the primary reason many have failed in early in-vitro or animal trials. For example, rhesus macaques who were vaccinated with the Spike protein of the SARS-CoV virus demonstrated severe acute lung injury when challenged with SARS-CoV, while monkeys who were not vaccinated did not.”
“Similarly, mice who were immunized with one of four different SARS-CoV vaccines showed histopathological changes in the lungs with eosinophil infiltration after being challenged with SARS-CoV virus. This did not occur in the controls that had not been vaccinated. A similar problem occurred in the development of a vaccine for FIPV, which is a feline coronavirus.” (“Is the Coronavirus Vaccine a Ticking-Time Bomb?”, Science with Dr. Doug)
Is this what we are seeing right now? In all the countries that launched mass-vaccination campaigns early (Israel, Iceland, Scotland, Gibraltar and UK) cases, hospitalizations and deaths are rising faster in the vaccinated portion of the population than the unvaccinated. Why?
Are they really experiencing a fourth or fifth wave or have the vaccines generated “inactivity-enhancing” antibodies that make the disease worse?
This 2-minute video helps to clarify what’s going on:
“Vaccines are made to a specific variant. And when that variant mutates, the vaccine no longer recognizes it. It’s like you are seeing a completely new virus. And, because that is so, you actually get more severe symptoms when you are vaccinated against one variant and it mutates and then your body sees the other variant.”
“The science shows, that if you get vaccinated in multiple years (for the flu), you are more likely to get severe disease, you are more likely to get viral replication, and you are more likely to be hospitalized…. We are seeing the same thing in Covid with the Delta variant. So we are actually mandating that people get a vaccine when they can actually get more sick when they are exposed to the virus…”
“In fact, this week, a paper came out that showed that–with the Delta variant– when you are vaccinated your body is supposed to make antibodies that neutralize the virus, but they were supposed to neutralize the old variant. When they see this new variant, the antibodies take the virus and help it infect the cells.” (“Expert testimony on mandatory vaccinations”, Dr Christina Parks PhD., Rumble, start at minute 5:05)
Repeat: “If you get vaccinated in multiple years, you are more likely to get severe disease, you are more likely to get viral replication, and you are more likely to be hospitalized…. With the Delta variant– when you are vaccinated …. the antibodies take the virus and help it infect the cells.”
Dangers of Covid-19 mRNA vaccination: This is ADE, and this is probably why hospitalizations and deaths are rising among the vaccinated in Israel, UK and the rest. True, the Delta variant is less lethal than the Wuhan virus but, unfortunately, that rule does not apply to those who have been vaccinated and whose antibodies promote the uptake of the virus into their cells.
This increases the viral replication function that increases the severity of the disease. In short, people are getting sicker because they were vaccinated. Here’s another short video that helps to explain:
“…The vaccine-induced antibodies will stand up against the virus. and once a virus is under pressure; it changes, it becomes a variant, and the variant cannot be stopped by vaccine-induced antibodies. Vaccine-induced antibodies. also shut down your innate immune system… so variants can come straight through and infect those that are vaccinated. That is viral immune escape, and that means that the vaccinated are defenseless against variants. This is no longer a pandemic of Covid-19. It is a pandemic of variants…
And there is something called recombination, and recombination means a vaccinated host can be infected by more than one variant at a time. …If a vaccinated host is co-infected by more than one variant, the variants will mix DNA, and change and camouflage and produce a super variant.
And if a super variants are produced, nothing can stop them. And already they are saying that the latest variant to come out is vaccine resistant.
And this is just the beginning. Dr Geert Vanden Bosche warns that if we do not immediately stop mass vaccination campaigns around the world, the world will experience an international catastrophe of mass mortality. I didn’t say that, he did. The vaccinated are a threat to us all.” (“Viral Immune Escape Explained”, Dr. Michael McDowell, Rumble)
It’s not the variant that intensifies the disease, it’s the fact that the vaccine targets one narrow endpoint, the spike protein, that gradually adapts to survive.
As the virus progressively learns to avoid the vaccine, vaccine-induced immunity wanes. Natural immunity produces broad, robust immunity to the whole virus not merely one part of it. It is strong and enduring.
So how will the vaccinated fight new forms of the virus, after all, the vaccine is not a medicine that overpowers a particular pathogen.
It is a subtle (genetic) reprogramming of the immune system that forces one’s cells to produce a particular version of the spike protein. Boosters that stimulate production of the same protein will have only modest impact. In short, boosters are still fighting the last war.
Also, as we mentioned above, coronavirus vaccines tend to create antibodies that “enhance infectivity” when they encounter adapted forms of the virus.
That means that millions of inoculated people will now face forms of the virus for which they have almost no protection and for which their compromised immune systems can only provide limited help. Here’s more from the article above:
“Right now, the fatality rate of the virus is estimated to be approximately 0.26%, and this number seems to be dropping as the virus is naturally attenuating itself through the population. It would be a great shame to vaccinate the entire population against a virus with this low of a fatality rate, especially considering the considerable risk presented by ADE.”
“I believe t his risk of developing ADE in a vaccinated individual will be much greater than 0.26%, and, therefore, the vaccine stands to make the problem worse, not better. It would be the biggest blunder of the century to see the fatality rate of this virus increase in the years to come because of our sloppy, haphazard, rushed efforts to develop a vaccine with such a low threshold of safety testing and the prospect of ADE lurking in the shadows.” (“Is the Coronavirus Vaccine a Ticking-Time Bomb?”, Science with Dr. Doug)
“Blunder”, he says?
It wasn’t a blunder. It was deliberate. The Covid-19 vaccine was supposed to fail like all the coronavirus vaccines before it. That’s the point.
That’s why the drug companies skipped the animal testing and long-term safety trials. That’s why the FDA rushed it through the regulatory process and suppressed the other life-saving medications, and silenced all critics of the policy, and pushed for universal vaccination regardless of the risks of blood clotting, cardiac arrest, stroke and death.
And that’s why the world is on the threshold of an “international catastrophe of mass mortality.” It’s because that’s how the strategy was planned from the very beginning.
The vaccine isn’t supposed to work, it’s supposed to make things worse. And it has! It’s increased the susceptibility of millions of people to severe illness and death. That’s what it’s done.
It’s a stealth weapon in an entirely new kind of war; a war aimed at restructuring the global order and establishing absolute social control. Those are the real objectives. It has nothing to do pandemics or viral contagion. It’s about power and politics. That’s all.
Double Vaccinated Emmy Winner Dies of Covid-19 Two Weeks After Attending Award Ceremony with Unmasked Celebrities
‘Bridgerton’ Emmy winner Marc Elliot Pilcher, 53, died of Covid-19 on Sunday two weeks after attending the 73rd Emmy Awards in Los Angeles.
Pilcher was “double vaccinated” and had no underlying conditions.
“It is with the deepest of hearts we confirm that Marc Elliot Pilcher, Academy Award Nominee and Emmy Award winning hair and makeup designer/stylist, passed away after a battle with Covid-19 on Sunday 3rd October 2021,” his family told Variety in a statement via Curtis Brown.
Variety reported Pilcher took and tested negative on several Covid tests in order to fly from the UK to Los Angeles to accept his Emmy statuette.
Shortly after Pilcher returned to the UK, he fell ill and died from Covid.
Only the ‘hired help’ was required to mask up last month at the Emmys.
LA health officials said the celebrities didn’t violate the county’s mask mandate because there are special exceptions for Hollywood degenerates.
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health said the maskless Emmys were not in violation of the county’s mask mandate because “exceptions are made for film, television, and music productions” since “additional safety modifications” are made for such events.
It appears the award ceremony full of ‘sophisticated, vaccinated people’ turned out to be a deadly super spreader
At birth, we boarded the train of life and met our parents; we believed that they would always travel by our side. However, at some station, our parents would step down from the train, leaving us on life’s journey alone. As time went by, significant people boarded the train: siblings, other children, friends, and even the love of our life. Many will step down and leave a permanent vacuum. Others will go so unnoticed that we won’t realize they vacated their seats!
This train ride will have been a mixture of joy, sorrow, fantasy, expectations, hellos, goodbyes, and farewells. A successful journey consists of having a good relationship with all passengers, requiring that we give the best of ourselves. The mystery that prevails is that we do not know at which station we ourselves will step down. Thus, we must try to travel along the track of life in the best possible way — loving, forgiving, giving, and sharing.
We all have a part to play in life, that’s why it’s so important that we are allowed to play it. It defines what we are and what we have become.
Please listen to the facts and read in full, you can’t make this stuff up.
Fully vaccinated people have a 885% higher chance of death due to Covid-19 than people who are unvaccinated according to official data
The Delta Covid-19 variant is currently rampant in the United Kingdom according to official data which has been released by Public Health England (PHE) in an attempt to justify the continuation of draconian restrictions on the lives of the British people.
However, we wonder if they realise that the very same data PHE released shows us that people who have received two doses of the Covid-19 vaccine have an 885% higher chance of dying of Covid-19 than of those who are unvaccinated?
Buy us a coffee! The PHE report which can be viewed here shows that between the 1st February 2021 and the 21st June 2021 a total of 92,029 confirmed cases of the Delta variant had been confirmed.
Of these 58.4% were people who had not been vaccinated, totalling 53,822.
A further 7.8% were people who had received both doses of a Covid-19 vaccine, totalling 7,235.
A further 14.9% were people who had received one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine at least three weeks prior to testing positive for the Delta Covid variant, totalling 13,715.
And a further 6.78% were people who had received one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine less than three weeks prior to testing positive for the Delta Covid variant, totalling 6,242.
As per the above table taken from the Public Health England report we can see that the number of positive cases of the Delta variant in people who are unvaccinated outnumber the number of positive cases of the Delta variant in people who are fully vaccinated by around 7.4 to 1.
This difference probably gives you the impression that the Covid-19 jabs are working fantastically? Well don’t get too excited.
Because if we take the number of people who have had at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine – 27,192, we can see that the number of people who are unvaccinated, who have tested positive for the Delta variant only outnumber people who have received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine by around 1.97 to 1.
They don’t seem so fantastic now do they?
But how do have these alleged confirmed cases of the alleged Delta Covid-19 variant translated into hospitalisations? Well thankfully Public Health England tell us within their report.
As per the above table we can see that of the 53,822 confirmed cases of the Delta Covid variant in people who were unvaccinated, 831 presented to emergency care which resulted in overnight inpatient admission. This accounts for 1.54% of the confirmed cases in people who are unvaccinated.
However, of the 7,235 confirmed cases of the Delta variant in people who are fully vaccinated people, 190 presented to emergency care which resulted in overnight inpatient admission. This accounts for 2.6% of the confirmed cases in people who are fully vaccinated.
This data, which has been published by Public Health England, shows us that people who have received two doses of a Covid-19 vaccine have a 70.1% higher chance of being hospitalised with the alleged Delta Covid variant than people who are unvaccinated.
None of the Covid-19 vaccines have been proven to prevent infection or prevent the spread of the alleged Covid-19 virus. Instead they have allegedly been proven to reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death, but even then the study carried out is highly questionable.
It doesn’t look like the Covid-19 vaccines are doing what they say on the tin, does it? Perhaps they’re doing their job at reducing the risk of death, thankfully Public Health England have provided the data for us to find out.
As per the above table we can see that of the 53,822 confirmed cases of the Delta Covid variant in people who are unvaccinated, 44 have sadly died. This accounts to 0.07% of confirmed cases in the people who are unvaccinated.
However, of the 7,235 confirmed cases of the Delta Covid variant in people who had received both doses of a Covid-19 vaccine and were therefore fully vaccinated, 50 have sadly died. This accounts to 0.69% of confirmed cases in people who are fully vaccinated.
This data, which again has been published by Public Health England, shows us that people who have received two doses of a Covid-19 vaccine have a 885.7% higher chance of dying due to the Delta Covid variant than people who are unvaccinated.
Now that definitely isn’t what the Covid-19 vaccines said they would do on the tin.
Is this evidence of antibody-dependent enhancement? One senior researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory – Stephanie Seneff, seems to think so.
ADE blighted previous attempts at coronavirus vaccines and frequently resulted in enhanced lung disease among vaccinated lab animals. It led researchers in 2012 to advise scientists to proceed with “caution” for any human coronavirus vaccines which could lead to enhanced lung disease.
Seneff said research has shown that coronavirus vaccines alter the ways immune systems respond to infection and can activate other sleeping infections in the vaccinated person.
“It is conceivable to me that the laser-beam specificity of the induced antibodies is offset by a general weakening of innate immunity,” Seneff said.
“I also suspect that massive vaccination campaigns may accelerate the rate at which the vaccine-resistant mutant strains become dominant among all the SARS-CoV-2 strains.”
Considering the fact 45 million people have had at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine in the United Kingdom at the time of writing, it looks like we’re in for one hell of a winter crisis.
CBS News host Gayle King pushed on Psaki during an interview saying, “we can’t ignore what has happened before. We’re still getting hammered for how the withdrawal from Afghanistan happened. Everybody knows, many people believe it was time. It’s just the way that it was done. So we all agree with that. That’s not a good look. You look at what’s happening with immigration. You look at France now saying that they’ve been betrayed by the United States. So I get that we have to look forward. But what are we doing to justify or explain what appears to be very bad behavior on our part?”
All Psaki could say is that “we don’t see it that way.” The failing press secretary never mentioned the situation in Afghanistan, their failing coronavirus policy, or the border crisis.
The fact that Psaki stormed off the stage like toddler tells you that there is real panic inside the administration.